# Rethinking the Concept of "Family" in Workplace Dynamics
Written on
Understanding the "Family" Narrative in Work Environments
In the ongoing struggle for work/life balance, a phrase is emerging that is increasingly problematic: "We are a family." Hearing this in a professional context can be unsettling, much like Dr. Ellie Sattler's famous warning in Jurassic Park, "Run!" This sentiment is becoming more prevalent in American organizational culture, where it initially seems benign. I have experienced numerous workplaces where such language is commonly used. During my orientation, I was often greeted with enthusiastic phrases like, "Welcome to the family!" as I navigated a sea of other "family" members, all smiles and supportive words. However, I don't pay my actual family members or have the authority to suddenly impact their livelihoods, so perhaps my perspective is unique. Still, I suspect many share my viewpoint.
At first, the "family" terminology from management and colleagues appeared harmless. It seemed to foster inclusivity and connections, making newcomers feel welcomed. But as time passed, the polished surface began to crack. This became evident when colleagues vanished unexpectedly. Were they no longer part of this "family"? The swift termination of such relationships is indeed telling.
But is this truly surprising? Employee turnover, whether through resignations or firings, is simply part of business. Companies prioritize profit above all else, and if an individual is not contributing to that goal, their position is often reevaluated. This is where the notion of a "family" within a business warrants scrutiny.
Defining "Family" in Context
An authentic family typically extends beyond financial connections, bound together by deeper ties. According to Britannica, a family consists of individuals linked by marriage, blood, or adoption, forming a single household and interacting in designated social roles, such as parents, children, and siblings. Additionally, friendships and close relationships can also be seen as family, further distinguishing these connections from employer/employee dynamics.
Historically, the term "family" referred to "a group of persons in the service of an individual," as per Merriam-Webster. In this sense, the workplace could indeed resemble a family—a group of employees serving the interests of the highest-ranking individual. Does this sound familiar?
While the definition has evolved, the question remains: Is the term "family" appropriate in a workplace setting? If we utilize this language to describe a group serving a singular individual, it may hold true; however, that is seldom the intent. More commonly, this narrative aims to bond employees and drive them to exceed their limits, creating unrealistic expectations and potential burnout.
The Rise of the "Family" Mentality
So, why has this trend gained traction? Several factors contribute to this phenomenon:
- Startup Culture: In startups, the "family" vibe thrives as employees adopt an "all hands on deck" mentality due to limited resources. Smaller teams can easily transition from camaraderie to the notion of being "family," blurring the lines.
- Remote Work: The rise of fully remote organizations often leads to misconceptions about relational distance. The absence of physical proximity can foster the belief that connections cannot be formed, making the "family" narrative an appealing solution to bridge that gap.
- Mental Health Awareness: With work/life balance becoming a hot topic, the emphasis on mental well-being has surged. Companies often use the "family" narrative to imply that employees should prioritize work over personal life, under the guise of familial loyalty.
Examining the Challenges of "Family" Language
Using "family" in a workplace context can pose several challenges:
- Excessive Productivity Expectations: The "family" narrative can pressure employees to work longer hours and exceed normal expectations, leading to burnout.
- False Security: Employees may feel a sense of protection that doesn't exist; businesses will prioritize their own interests over individual employees when necessary.
- Artificial Inclusion: The terminology may inadvertently exclude marginalized individuals. For instance, a colleague of color once expressed discomfort with the "family" term, feeling it was not inclusive. The reaction from leadership highlighted a reluctance to change the language due to fears it would affect workplace culture.
- Generational Shifts: Younger generations are reevaluating their relationship with work. They prioritize their human experience over labor, questioning why work should dominate their lives.
Insights Gained
- The initial intent behind using "family" likely stemmed from a desire to foster team bonding and collaboration. However, is it a sustainable long-term strategy? I doubt it.
- As organizations expand, the "family" language loses its meaning. Employees may no longer know their colleagues, making the term seem hollow.
- Expecting individuals to embrace the "We are family" mindset is unrealistic; many are just trying to earn a living, not seeking a new family.
- Promoting "family" dynamics can obscure the real benefits that employees seek, such as improved healthcare, better work-life balance, and meaningful relationships without forced labels.
Moving Forward: Embracing the "Team" Concept
It's time to retire the "family" notion in workplaces. Instead, adopting the term "team" can convey professionalism while still allowing for meaningful relationships. This change will help set boundaries and keep the focus on completing tasks and meeting expectations.
While "team" may seem less warm, it offers clarity, allowing us to cultivate valuable relationships without the complexities associated with familial ties. Ultimately, prioritizing a "team" mindset can lead to a healthier work environment.