The Enigmatic Origins of the Huns Who Toppled Rome
Written on
Chapter 1: The Rise of the Huns
The Huns are recognized as one of ancient Rome's most formidable adversaries. Emerging seemingly out of nowhere from the Hungarian plains, they wreaked havoc across the region. By the fifth century, under the leadership of Atilla, they established one of history's largest empires. However, the Hunnic Empire's glory was fleeting, collapsing soon after Atilla's demise. To this day, various nations in Eastern and Central Europe claim a connection to Atilla and his fierce Huns.
But who exactly were these people, and what prompted their sudden emergence in Hungary?
Since the late 18th century, historians have been embroiled in debates regarding the Huns' origins, with numerous theories proposed. These discussions have often taken a politically charged turn, igniting heated arguments among scholars and the general public alike. The controversies surrounding the ancient roots of the Huns remain unresolved.
The Huns left no written records that could clarify their origins, but recent genetic research may offer insights into the lineage of these legendary horsemen who brought the mighty Roman Empire to its knees.
As we delve into the origins of the Huns, let’s examine the first known theory from the 18th century. A French orientalist's assertions and the agreement of a prominent historian of that era will shed light on this topic.
Did the Huns Emerge from the Xiongnu?
Joseph de Guignes, a French orientalist, was captivated by the histories of China and the Turkic peoples. In 1757, he became the first to propose that the Huns originated from the Xiongnu, who were ancient China's most significant adversaries.
The Great Wall of China was constructed to keep marauding nomadic tribes at bay, including the Xiongnu, who formed a powerful confederation.
You may recall elements from the Disney film Mulan, where Mulan battles invading forces led by Chanyu, the leader of the Xiongnu confederacy. The Xiongnu were the most dominant nomadic coalition in the ancient world, creating an empire larger than that of Alexander the Great. Their legendary conflicts with the Han Chinese are well-documented.
In exchange for peace, the Han dynasty sent tribute, including a Han princess and luxury goods, to the Xiongnu—a humiliating arrangement for the Chinese.
Eventually, the Han dynasty reformed its military, forged alliances, and overcame the Xiongnu, a saga explored in earlier works.
But why did de Guignes assert that the Huns were descendants of the Xiongnu?
His reasoning was straightforward: the Chinese referred to the Xiongnu as "Hunnu," which bears a resemblance to the term "Huns." The Huns adopted titles from Xiongnu royalty and honored Xiongnu heroes, indicating a connection between the two groups.
Edward Gibbon, a renowned historian and contemporary of de Guignes, found this hypothesis compelling. He, too, endorsed the idea of Xiongnu origins for the Huns, a viewpoint that gained traction and remained largely unchallenged until the 20th century.
However, the theory linking the Huns to the Xiongnu has a significant flaw. The use of imperial titles does not necessarily indicate a direct lineage. For instance, the Holy Roman Empire identified as Roman and utilized Latin, but that does not imply that Charlemagne was a descendant of Julius Caesar.
While political continuity may be plausible, it does not establish a genetic connection.
Friedrich Hirth, a German Sinologist, examined the Wei Shu, detailing the Northern Wei dynasty's history from the third to the fifth century. He argued for the Huns' origins within the Xiongnu Empire, but this claim was contested by Otto Maenchen-Helfen, who suggested that Hirth misinterpreted the Chinese records.
In his work, The World of the Huns (1973), Maenchen-Helfen contended that no connection existed between the Huns and the Xiongnu, based on archaeological findings.
Despite some dissenters, the consensus among scholars was that the Xiongnu were not the ancestors of the Huns until early 2000s, when groundbreaking discoveries emerged from studies of Xiongnu burials in Northern China.
The first video explores how a devastating plague severely impacted the Roman Empire, shedding light on the historical context that allowed the Huns to thrive.
Chapter 2: The Genetic Puzzle
Archaeological evidence and Chinese historical accounts suggest that the Xiongnu comprised a diverse mix of ethnicities, including East Asian, West Eurasian, Turkic, and Iranian tribes.
In 2010, researchers Kijeong Kim and colleagues uncovered West Eurasian DNA among the remains of three Xiongnu nobles. This genetic infusion may have originated from the Scythians, who migrated from the Black Sea region to Siberia.
- Damgaad (2018) examined the genetic profiles of 137 ancient individuals from the Eurasian steppes, concluding that the Xiongnu represented a blend of East and West Eurasian populations.
What does the genetic data reveal about the Huns?
As the Huns advanced westward, they absorbed various West Eurasian tribes, including the Alans of Iranian descent. Many Germanic tribes, like the Gepids, also joined Atilla's ranks. Following Atilla's death, the Gepids, led by Ardaric, revolted against the Huns, marking the end of the Hunnic Empire.
The Huns operated as a confederation. Most historians believe that the Hunnic aristocracy had Turkic roots.
But what do DNA studies indicate?
Endre Neparáczki (2019), a Hungarian geneticist, analyzed the DNA of 49 individuals from the Huns, Avars, and Magyars, who dominated the Hungarian plains after the fall of the Western Roman Empire. He concluded that the Huns exhibited a mix of East and West Eurasian ancestry, akin to the Xiongnu, encompassing Caucasian, Turkic, and Mongolian heritage.
Based on their findings, the researchers proposed that Atilla's Huns were related to the Xiongnu, albeit with the caveat of a limited sample size.
So, where do we go from here?
Attempting to link the genetics of two multi-ethnic confederacies—the Xiongnu and the Huns—may prove fruitless. While a connection between the Huns and the Xiongnu is plausible, genetic studies alone do not reveal political continuity.
Chinese records indicate that when the Xiongnu were defeated by the Xianbei, a group of proto-Mongol allies in the first century AD, the Xiongnu retreated to the Altai mountains in present-day Kazakhstan.
The disintegration of a large confederacy is a complex process, often leading to tribes defecting and new ones joining. The Xiongnu may have succumbed to such fates, facing pressure from adversaries like the Wusun and the Kushans, who capitalized on their weakened state.
The Xiongnu diminished in power and prestige, with their society undergoing significant transformation. Yet, some sought to reclaim their former glory.
As Central Asian powers like the Kushans, who dominated Silk Road trade, began to decline, a new nomadic confederation emerged. This rising power began migrating westward in the fourth century, eventually revealing itself in the Pontic Steppes.
These were the Huns.
While we cannot definitively connect the Huns to the Xiongnu, it is clear that the Huns regarded the Xiongnu with reverence, considering themselves their true descendants. They adopted similar political titles to those of the Xiongnu aristocracy.
Scholars such as John Man have questioned the political continuity between the Xiongnu and the Huns, arguing that the former possessed a higher level of organization, with their empire enduring for an extended period. Such longevity suggests that the Xiongnu excelled in diplomacy and governance more than the Huns.
Existing evidence hints at a potential relationship between the Huns and the Xiongnu, though this connection may be tenuous. In the Steppes, it was common for tribes to claim lineage from powerful dynasties.
The origins of the Huns will remain a topic of debate. However, it is important to note that the idea of Xiongnu origins cannot be easily dismissed. Future genetic analyses, coupled with archaeological evidence, may enhance our understanding.
Perhaps the Huns were as closely related to the Xiongnu as the Holy Roman Empire was to the ancient Romans. They shared political structures, cultural elements, and possibly some genealogical ties, yet the two empires—Huns and Xiongnu—were fundamentally different.
Nomadic groups from the Steppes significantly influenced Eurasian politics, with their migration patterns revealing intriguing historical shifts. They transitioned from westward to eastward migrations during the Bronze Age and Early Iron Age. However, during the era of the Xiongnu and later the Huns, their movements shifted westward, instigating a series of events that contributed to the fall of the Roman Empire.
The West Eurasian elements found in the Xiongnu may trace back to the Pazyryk Culture, a Scythian civilization that thrived in Siberia from the sixth to second century BC.
Curious about their appearance? Explore the story of the Siberian Ice Maiden for more insights.
The second video delves into the historical accounts of how ancient Romans perceived the Huns, providing context for their fierce reputation.