Stoicism: A Philosophy of Subversion and Reflection
Written on
Understanding Stoicism's Nature
Is Stoicism inherently conservative or progressive? At a glance, this question may seem irrelevant. The terms "conservative" and "progressive" are contemporary labels that reflect specific cultural viewpoints. However, it is worthwhile to consider whether Stoic practice merely accepts the status quo or actively seeks to challenge it—or if it does neither.
Many ancient Greco-Roman philosophies appear to endorse the existing order. For instance, Epicureanism encourages individuals to withdraw from social and political engagements, aiming for a tranquil life devoid of pain. Similarly, Pyrrhonian Skepticism tends to favor social conservatism, advocating for the suspension of judgment on non-evident issues, thus conforming to local customs.
In contrast, the Cynics were provocateurs, boldly criticizing social norms and highlighting the emptiness of conventional lives. Given that Stoicism shares a lineage with Cynicism, it may be more radical than commonly perceived.
To substantiate this view, let’s examine nine features of Stoicism that suggest it is a subversive lifestyle choice.
No Place for Deception
Stoic philosophy emphasizes that to lead a fulfilling life, one must grasp the workings of the world and engage in rational thought. A notable exchange between Epictetus and a student illustrates this:
“When an audience member asked Epictetus to prove the necessity of logic, he replied: ‘Do you want me to demonstrate this? — Yes. — Then, must I use demonstrative reasoning? — Upon agreement, Epictetus continued, How will you discern if I mislead you? — The student had no answer, leading Epictetus to state: You see, your own admission highlights the necessity of this instruction; without it, you cannot even ascertain its importance’” (Discourses, 2.25).
In today’s world, where misinformation and manipulated narratives proliferate through social media, Stoicism stands against the tide. A Stoic rejects falsehoods and poor reasoning.
Minimalism and External Concerns
In Stoicism, “externals” refer to things beyond our control, such as wealth, reputation, and relationships. While these aspects hold significance, their value derives from our use of them. For instance, wealth is seen as beneficial only when employed to uplift others. Epictetus likens life to playing a game, where handling challenges with grace is vital:
“Socrates was like a player at ball, engaging with whatever life threw at him, including imprisonment or exile, yet he played well” (Discourses, 2.5).
Ultimately, Stoicism encourages us to focus not on what we possess but on how we respond to circumstances, positioning it in opposition to rampant consumerism.
The Pursuit of Virtue
Stoicism does not serve as a mere tool for achieving success or wealth. Instead, it champions the pursuit of virtue, even if that entails personal sacrifice. Socrates encapsulates this ethos:
“Doing wrong is the gravest evil, while suffering injustice is not” (Plato, Gorgias, 469).
The Stoics believed that one's character is paramount, and inflicting harm upon others ultimately harms oneself. This perspective starkly contrasts modern values, which often prioritize personal gain.
Duties Over Rights
Today's discourse frequently centers on individual rights. While these rights are essential for a functioning society, they must be matched with corresponding duties. For instance, the right to free speech entails the responsibility to exercise it judiciously.
Stoicism posits that moral duties are integral to both personal life and societal cohesion. Cicero remarked:
“No aspect of life, whether public or private, can exist without moral duty; neglecting these duties leads to moral decay” (On Duties, 1.4).
Shifting focus from a purely rights-oriented dialogue to one that balances rights with duties is indeed a subversive notion.
The Role of Reason
In our era, it’s common to hear people claim they cannot control their feelings. However, both Stoicism and cognitive behavioral therapy advocate for the management of emotions through rational discourse. As Epictetus states:
“Whenever an external impression strikes you, remind yourself that it is merely that—an impression, not reality. Reflect on how you can respond” (Enchiridion 1, 10).
This emphasis on reason is crucial, especially when contemporary society often overlooks its significance.
Perception of Insults
In a time when insults can easily escalate, Stoicism teaches us to manage our reactions. Epictetus advises:
“Remember, it is not the individual who reviles or strikes you that insults you, but your judgment that interprets their actions as insulting” (Enchiridion, 20).
By controlling our responses, we can rise above perceived slights and maintain our integrity.
Embracing Mortality
In modern society, discussions about death are often avoided. Yet, the Stoics argue that acknowledging mortality is essential for living a meaningful life. Seneca states:
“Those who fear death cannot truly have cherished life, as life is granted with the certainty of death” (Letters to Lucilius, 30.10, 18).
Understanding death provides urgency and significance to our actions.
The Illusion of Selfishness vs. Altruism
Stoicism blurs the lines between selfishness and altruism, suggesting that helping others also benefits oneself. Marcus Aurelius writes:
“The Universe has shaped rational beings for mutual benefit” (Meditations 9.1).
Human cooperation is vital for survival, underscoring the interconnectedness of all beings.
Citizens of the World
In a world rife with conflict, the Stoic ideal promotes a cosmopolitan perspective, viewing all humans as part of a universal family. Epictetus emphasizes:
“If the philosophers are correct about our kinship, we should identify not by nationality but as citizens of the universe” (Discourses, 1.9).
While this does not advocate for the elimination of nations, it calls for collective responsibility towards our shared planet.
Conclusion: A Subversive Philosophy
In summary, Stoicism presents a complex blend of perspectives that defy easy categorization as conservative or progressive. The points discussed do not strictly align with contemporary political divides; instead, they encourage nuanced thinking and self-reflection.
Ultimately, the aim of engaging with these Stoic ideas is to foster doubt, encouraging inquiry and exploration rather than rigid certainty. It’s possible that the ancient Stoics simply lacked a modern understanding of political axes, or perhaps it is we who struggle to recognize that ethical living transcends simplistic labels.